In reviewing the grant of summary judgment to a medical device manufacturer, the Third Circuit has certified two legal issues to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court for possible guidance. MELISSA EBERT, Appellant v. C.R. BARD, INC.; BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INC., a subsidiary &/or division of Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc., No. 20-2139, 2021 WL 2656690, at *1

Sean Wajert
Sean P. Wajert is a partner at Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP, and the Managing Partner of Shook's Philadelphia office. He concentrates his complex litigation practice on the defense of companies from a variety of industries, including the chemical, consumer product, drug and medical device industries. His practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, mass tort, toxic tort and product liability litigation, and appellate work. For a decade he served as Chair of the Products Liability Group of his prior firm. Sean also taught complex litigation issues for ten years as a Lecturer-in-Law at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.
Supreme Court Weighs in on Standing Again
Today’s post looks at standing and the recent US Supreme Court decision in Transunion v. Ramirez, No. 20–297 (U.S. Decided June 25, 2021). The case arose out of the Fair Credit Reporting Act which regulates the consumer reporting agencies and also creates a cause of action for consumers to sue and recover damages for…
Drug Claims Preempted – Lack of Newly Acquired Evidence
Today’s post looks at Rayes v. Novartis Pharms. Corp., No. EDCV21201JGBKKX, 2021 WL 2410677 (C.D. Cal. June 11, 2021), which contains an interesting discussion of an aspect of drug product preemption. The Supreme Court discussed in Wyeth and later clarified in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht, 139 S. Ct. 1668, 1679 (2019),…
New Jersey Federal Court Considering Important Rule Change
As we have noted in prior posts, there appears to have been an uptick in the funding of litigation by third parties, a practice that has rightly been questions as opportunistic, overly secretive, contrary to notions of standing and fair play, and as a practice that may lead to increased unnecessary litigation. Back in April…
Judge Weinstein Passes at 99
Readers may not have seen that former U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein passed away this week at the age of 99.
He sat on the Eastern District of New York bench from 1967 to 2020, having been nominated to the bench by President Lyndon B. Johnson. He presided over a number of landmark and…
Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Chicken Consumer Class Claims
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action accusing Trader Joe’s of mislabeling its chicken packaging. Webb v. Trader Joe’s Co., No. 19-56389, 2021 WL 2275265 (9th Cir. June 4, 2021).
Plaintiff claims she purchased “All Natural Boneless Chicken Breasts,” “All Natural Chicken Thighs,” and “All Natural Chicken Wings,” (the Products)…
Commentary on (C)(4) Class Actions
Those class action mavens among our readers will want to check out the commentary article by my colleagues James P. Muehlberger, Timothy E. Congrove and Daniel E. Cummings.
The paper is “Class Actions -Will The Supreme Court Finally Resolve The Circuit Split Over Rule 23(C)(4) Issue Class Actions?”
You can find it in the June…
Summary Judgment Granted in Zofran MDL
As Sergeant Joe Friday instructed, just the facts, as Shook was involved. Those interested in the preemption doctrine will want to read the opinion by Judge Saylor in In Re Zofran, granting summary judgment for defendant and applying the first prong of Wyeth as clarified by Merck v. Albrecht.
…
Court of Appeals Upholds Defense Jury Verdict in Chipper Case
The Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed a jury verdict for defendant in a suit alleging that it sold faulty wood chippers to an equipment rental company. James v. Terex USA, LLC, No. 20-14553, 2021 WL 2137599 (11th Cir. May 26, 2021).
At trial, the plaintiff sought to introduce lay testimony from a Shane Dinkins about…
Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal of Gun Case
The Tenth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a suit seeking to hold a gunmaker n liable for injuries a woman alleged she suffered when a rifle fired spontaneously. Harris v. Remington Arms Co., LLC, 997 F.3d 1107 (10th Cir. 2021). The case turned on the admissibility of plaintiff’s expert evidence.
Roughly two years after…