Consumer Fraud
Ninth Circuit Refuses to Revive Water Class Action
The Ninth Circuit this week declined to revive a proposed class action in Washington federal court accusing defendant of mis-labeling a water drink containing caffeine. See Harold Maple v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, No. 13-36089, 14-35038 and 14-35059, 2016 WL 2621345 (9th Cir. 5/9/16).
This was a putative class action arising from allegedly unfair or deceptive…
Court of Appeals Affirms Summary Judgment in Home Products Case
The 8th Circuit recently affirmed the grant of summary judgment to the defendant in a proposed class action brought by an Iowa homeowner suing over allegedly defective house trim. See Brown v. La.-Pac. Corp., No. 15-1830, 2016 WL 1425824 (8th Cir. 4/12/16).
In 2003, Brown purchased a lot and hired a contractor, who in turn…
Court of Appeals Rejects Washer Class Action
The 11th Circuit recently ruled that class certification had been improperly granted to owners of front-loading washing machines that allegedly were susceptible to mold build-up. See Brown v. Electrolux Home Prods. Inc., No. 15-11455, 2016 WL 1085517 (11th Cir. 3/21/16).
Across the country, consumers have filed class actions against the manufacturers of front-loading washing machines.…
Federal Court Rejects Tea Class Action
A federal court in California has rejected a proposed class action in a case challenging claims on tea labels. See Alex Khasin et al. v. R.C. Bigelow Inc., No. 4:12-cv-02204 (N.D. Calif. 3/29/16),
Plaintiff Khasin sought certification of a class of all persons in California who purchased for household use one or more of…
Ninth Circuit Upholds Rejection of Lip Balm Class
The Ninth Circuit last week rejected a putative class action accusing a defendant of deceiving consumers about the quantity of product accessible in a lip balm tube. See EBNER V. FRESH, INC., No. Case: 13-56644 (9th Cir. 03/17/2016).
Plaintiff alleged that cosmetics and skin care products manufacturer Fresh, Inc. deceived consumers about the quantity…
Defendant Seeks Review of Trial by Formula Decision
Defendant Google has filed a powerful cert petition, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a controversial Ninth Circuit decision reviving a putative class action. See Pulaski & Middleman LLC, et al. v. Google Inc., No. 15-1101 (U.S. petition filed 3/1/16).
This case presents the issue whether plaintiffs may use a formula that relies on…
Supreme Court Rules on Effect of Offers to Named Class Plaintiffs
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision earlier this week in a case raising the issue whether a defendant can cut off a Telephone Consumer Protection…
Continue Reading Supreme Court Rules on Effect of Offers to Named Class Plaintiffs
FDA Seeks Comment on “Natural” Labels
Readers will recall our many posts about the “all natural” litigation and the spate of cases plaintiff firms have brought challenging such l…
Continue Reading FDA Seeks Comment on “Natural” Labels
Federal Court Rejects Class Action on 23(a) Grounds
A federal court in Massachusetts federal court recently denied class certification to consumers who claimed their wood-plastic composite decks were de…
Continue Reading Federal Court Rejects Class Action on 23(a) Grounds