The judges agreed that they are not overly impressed with arguments noting the expert was excluded by other courts on other cases. If the facts are nearly identical, and they respect the other judge, and there is an opinion or order with some reasoning, they may give it some weight. But if the expert opinion was also admitted in some other cases, this may cancel out the influence of prior exclusions.
Finally, while many lawyers talk about filing an iffy or uncertain motion to “educate” the court as to important science issues, the panel suggested this often doesn’t help. There may be a time lag between the motion and trial; and the loss of momentum from losing a motion may have carry-over effects in the litigation.